Karasu, Karasu/Sakarya
Karasu, Sakarya is a residential neighbourhood where the median sale price for housing stands at 27,647 TL/m², slightly above the district median of 26,863 TL/m². The market is characterized by a mix of apartments and summer homes, with a notable premium for properties featuring pools.
Explore the area in 3D.
Drag: pan · right-drag (or compass): rotate/tilt · scroll: zoom · terrain top-right.
AI estimate from parcel dossier + KEOS zoning + live ₺/m² + TKGM transactions + road cession; ₺/m² computed from real listings. Not an official appraisal or investment advice.
Median price ₺
for saleWalkability
6 points of interest · OSMThe location's thesis.
Karasu is best suited for buyers seeking seasonal or secondary residences, particularly those interested in summer homes or compact apartments, as indicated by the price premiums for these sub-types. The market appeals to cash-rich buyers or those less sensitive to high mortgage rates, given the elevated interest rates and the nature of the housing stock. It is less ideal for those requiring high walkability or public transit access, as the area lacks these urban amenities.
- High mortgage interest rates (42.04%) may suppress credit-driven demand, potentially slowing transaction volumes or favoring cash buyers.
- The neighbourhood has a low walkability score (0) and no public transit access, which may limit its appeal to renters or buyers without private vehicles.
- The region is located in a high seismic hazard zone (Zone 1) with a high peak ground acceleration (0.46g), which may impact insurance costs and construction requirements.
- The market has a limited sample size for certain sub-types (e.g., only 1 land listing), which may reduce the reliability of price comparisons for those categories.
Housing, land, commercial and building — by type.
Konut
₺/m² · 21 listings · high confidenceArazi
₺/m² · 1 listings · low confidence₺/m² by property type.
Daire
₺/m² · 13 listingsYazlık
₺/m² · 4 listingsThe median price of 27,647 TL/m² indicates a pricing level marginally higher than the broader Karasu district average (26,863 TL/m²), suggesting a slight local premium. The sub-type spread reveals that summer homes (yazlik) command a higher median price (30,574 TL/m²) compared to standard apartments (24,706 TL/m²), reflecting a preference for seasonal or secondary housing assets. Within apartments, 1+1 units are priced higher per square meter (28,478 TL/m²) than 2+1 units (24,706 TL/m²), which may indicate a market driven by smaller, potentially investment-oriented or compact units. The presence of land listings at 106,667 TL/m² (n=1) highlights a significant value disparity between developed residential units and raw land, though the sample size is too small to generalize. The rent-vs-sale relation is not explicitly detailed in the provided data, but the high mortgage interest rate (42.04%) suggests that cash buyers or those with existing capital hold significant leverage in this market.
₺/m² by property type and layout
Bar: p25 — median — p75. Wide range within a type+layout = view/floor/aspect premium.
Price dispersion
Dispersion: Medium · (p75−p25) / medyan = 0.47
Premium drivers · vs overall median
Havuzlu
4 listings · +%9 vs medianHow each feature shifts ₺/m² vs the overall median; from sea/view/pool and in-complex info in listing titles.
Branded projects and price premium
Neighbourhood median 27.059 ₺/m²; branded projects trade at a premium/discount vs the median.
KARASU HOMES
3 listings · max 23.077 · −%35 vs medianComplexes, new-builds and mix in the area
In a complex
3 / 21 listingsNew / under construction
1 yeni · 0 projeHousing listings for sale
kamuya açık ilan verisi — mahalle (satılık konut)Surroundings & transit.
Official location · Karasu Mahallesi, Karasu, Sakarya, Marmara Bölgesi, Türkiye
Walkability
Public transit
Diğer
İbadethane (3), Drinking Water (1)Günlük ihtiyaç
Akaryakıt (2)The neighbourhood exhibits low walkability and transit accessibility, with a walkability score of 0 and no nearby bus stops, implying a car-dependent lifestyle. Points of interest within 1.5 km are limited to religious sites, drinking water sources, and fuel stations, suggesting that daily needs may require travel beyond the immediate vicinity. This lack of dense urban amenities and transit options aligns with a quieter, possibly suburban or semi-rural residential character, rather than a high-density urban core.
Recent developments.
2026-08-19
2026-08-26
2026-09-02
Investment assessment
This neighbourhood presents a niche investment profile suitable for buyers seeking seasonal assets or compact units, as evidenced by the premium on summer homes and 1+1 apartments. The wide price dispersion (p25–p75: 17,647–30,380 TL/m²) suggests that careful selection is required to capture value, as properties with specific drivers like pools can command a 9% premium over the median. The dominance of 2+1 units in the inventory (14 out of 21 listings) indicates a family-oriented stock, while the higher per-square-meter price for 1+1 units points to a distinct segment for investors or smaller households. Without historical price momentum data, the investment outlook remains static, relying on the current price differential with the district median and the specific utility of summer homes.
Not a hard forecast; inference from observed trend + macro context. Not investment advice.
If you'd bought this a year ago
Sample (anonymised) listing: 2+1 · 85 m² · current price 2.100.000 ₺. Estimated price a year ago ~1.770.837 ₺ (regional property index).
Taşınmaz: TCMB konut endeksi (Bolu/Kocaeli/Sakarya/Yalova/Düzce)
Each row: what the same capital (the property's estimated price a year ago) would be worth today in that asset — all prices real; past returns don't guarantee the future. USD: TCMB; Altın: spot (PAXG, gram); BTC: CoinGecko
Related Regions
This analysis is based on regional listing data, OSM, UAVT, and TCMB macroeconomic indicators. It relies on median prices and listing distributions from the provided packet. Macro factors such as interest rates and zoning are considered in the context of the provided data, but broader economic trends are not fully integrated. The seismic risk is noted based on provincial-level data, not parcel-specific assessments.